<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fidelity on Tate Eskew</title><link>http://tateeskew.com/tags/fidelity/</link><description>Recent content in Fidelity on Tate Eskew</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Tate Eskew</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://tateeskew.com/tags/fidelity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bandcamp and quality</title><link>http://tateeskew.com/weblog/2008-10-13-bandcampmu-and-quality/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://tateeskew.com/weblog/2008-10-13-bandcampmu-and-quality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, we engineers spend ridiculous amounts of money on preamps, compressors, eq, etc., yet when all is said and done, the end result is compressed into some horrible sounding mp3 file and listened to on a pair of crappy earbuds. My friend &lt;a href="http://www.chadblinman.com"&gt;Chad&lt;/a&gt; and I have discussed this ad nauseam. We even started &lt;a href="http://www.functionalequivalentrecordings.com"&gt;Functional Equivalent Recordings&lt;/a&gt; so that we would have a place to not only release our music in the form we want it to be heard in, but also to express that we want higher fidelity in the recordings released by all artists, which we don&amp;rsquo;t find to be particularly ground-breaking and wonder why this isn&amp;rsquo;t the norm already.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>